The metal lanthanum strontium copper oxide might not mean much to most of us, but to physicists it just might hold the secret to developing electronics that conduct electricity with near perfect efficiency.
When placed inside a powerful magnetic field, the substance doesn’t conduct quite like other metals.
Once we learn why, we might at last understand how an alluring class of materials called high temperature superconductors (HTS) work their magic.
Unlike their low temperature cousins, these warm materials are made of certain combinations of elements arranged so that a charge can move with freedom in spite of the interruptions of rudely jiggling particles.
Mind you, ‘warm’ is pretty relative. They still need temperatures below −135 °C (−211 °F). That’s better than the roughly −240 °C (−405 °F) of low temperature superconductors, but it won’t help you squeeze more juice from your laptop battery.
Pushing the boundaries on high temperature superconductors might get us there one day. The only problem is we don’t know a great deal about how they function.
A research team led by the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory at Florida State University has found an interesting coincidence that might point the way to a mechanism behind the phenomenon.
In most metals, electrons interact with other particles in their environment to form what’s called a quasiparticle. More than the sum of their parts, this object has all the features of your normal electron, with some tweaks.
Quasiparticles are also used to explain how a charge moves smoothly through superconductors. Coupling with features of their environment, the electron changes its behavior, helping it behave in unusual ways.
Understanding more about these quasiparticle states seems to be key to working out the puzzle of how to build a superconductor that can handle some heat.
Copper oxide materials – called cuprates – form one category of HTS. They’re thin sheets of copper oxide sandwiched between other materials that help ‘dope’ the conducting layers.
At the right temperature this combination becomes what materials scientists call a “strange metal”.
The strangeness comes from the odd relationship between the steady temperature drop and the amount of resistance provided by its jiggling atoms.
For most metals, as the temperature climbs, each added degree adds the same amount of resistance. This whole linear relationship falls apart at colder temperatures.
Not so for cuprates. While they’re still in their chilly superconducting zone, they continue to show a “strange” linear relationship between resistance and temperature.
The researchers were curious about the relationship between resistance and the strength of the surrounding magnetic field. Other studies had applied magnetism to test various characteristics of cuprates, but none had studied variations in its strength.
So they placed a piece of the cuprate lanthanum strontium copper oxide into a magnetic field of a whopping 80 teslas – more than 50 times stronger than the field you’d find in your average medical scanner.
Tweaking this field also revealed a linear relationship in resistance, just as it had in its “strange” state with a drop in temperature.
The similarities are unlikely to be pure coincidence.
“Usually when you see such things, that means that it’s a very simple principle behind it,” says physicist Arkady Shekhter.
That correlation between electrons happens to rule out any role for independent quasiparticles. Meaning this is has to be something altogether different to your typical conductivity.
“Here we have a situation where no existing language can help,” says Shekhter. “We need to find a new language to think about these materials.”
With a new language comes the possibility of new ways to build and tune even stranger materials with superconducting properties.
Including – just maybe – some that don’t need a tank of liquid hydrogen to keep cool.
This research was published in Science.