California earthquake: Is the San Andreas fault line at risk of the BIG ONE? | Science | News

Products You May Like


The San Andreas fault line is an 800-mile long tectonic boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate – two great fragments of the Earth’s crust.

The fault line extends about 10 miles into the Earth and is an intricate system of crushed and broken rock along the Californian coast.

According to the Geological Survey (USGS), the fault line extends from Northern California, through San Francisco and down and just north of Los Angeles.

The USGS said: “The San Andreas fault forms a continuous narrow break in the Earth’s crust that extends from northern California southward to Cajon Pass near San Bernardino.

“Southeastward from Cajon Pass several branching faults, including the San Jacinto and Banning faults, share the movement of the crustal plates.

“In this stretch of the fault zone, the name ‘San Andreas’ generally is applied to the northeasternmost branch.”

Is the San Andreas fault line at risk of a major earthquake?

Geologists hypothesise the southern end of the San Andreas fault line could be the central point for a major striking the region.

A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Lithosphere, examined the possibility of a magnitude 7.5 or stronger earthquake along a southern 30km stretch of the fault line.

Geologist Susanne Jänecke, Utah State University, constructed a detailed structural map of this fault line fragment to identify a “transpressional, 1–4-km-wide ladder-like structure” dubbed Durmid Hill.

The Durmid Hill was found to extend northwest from the San Andreas fault and east into a newly identified East Shoreline fault zone.

In the study, Dr Jänecke wrote: ‘The great width of the East Shoreline fault zone in Durmid Hill and the even larger with and spatial extent of the Durmid ladder structure imply that surface faulting hazards from a major earthquake rupture in this part of the San Andreas fault zone might be dispersed across a 40 square kilometres area, if both master faults and the intervening cross faults are activated at once.”

However, the geologist noted it is still unclear how this newly discovered structure interacted with past earthquakes along the fault line.

The uncertainty makes it hard to predict future earthquake behaviour, Dr Jänecke added, and until recently geologists only focused on the active San Andreas fault.

But the size and geometry of the East Shoreline fault zone and Durmid Hill both suggest the zones could fail in the event of a single earthquake.

The study noted: “If ladder-like strike-slip fault zone rupture in a piecemeal fashion they will have an especially unpredictable surface-faulting hazard.”

According to the USGS, large earthquakes along the San Andreas fault have occurred roughly every 150 years in the past 1,400 to 1,500 years.

The last major earthquake struck the fault in 1906 in the San Fransisco Bay Area but the USGS is not convinced the scale and intensity of future earthquakes can be predicted way ahead of impact.

The USGS said: “A great earthquake very possibly will not occur unannounced.

“Such an earthquake may be preceded by an increase in seismicity for several years, possibly including several foreshocks of about magnitude 5 along the fault.

“Before the next large earthquake, seismologists also expect to record changes in the Earth’s surface, such as a shortening of survey lines across the fault, changes in elevation, and effects on strainmeters in wells.”

The USGS noted historical data does not provide enough information to establish whether or not a pattern exists in the timing of earthquakes in California.



Source link

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Giant Asteroid Unleashed a Devastating Martian Megatsunami, Evidence Suggests : ScienceAlert
Mummies With Golden Tongues Discovered in Ancient Egyptian Necropolis : ScienceAlert
Chilling Glimpse Into Our Future if We Survive Another Million Years : ScienceAlert
Earth’s Oxygen Came From an Unexpectedly Deep And Hot Source, Study Suggests : ScienceAlert
It Sounds Crazy, But Walking Backwards Is Really, Really Good For You : ScienceAlert

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *